Sunday, October 07, 2007

Social networking sites


They do. I've seen more heartache, pain and misery emanating from social networking sites than I've seen in a lot of places for a long time.

The filth are like a hidden army running through those sites, sometimes in packs and often in more than one site at a time, luring kids into god knows what.

Oli's brother grabbed me into one such site and after lurking there for a tad over 6 months now, I've managed to get one kid out of a nest of filth and I hope for all I'm worth I'm not too late to extricate another - and that's not even beginning to address the more than 850 kids who were on John Quan's friends list before the posse hounded him into submission, forced him to hide his MySpace picture, caught him out at Ringo and eventually stole his account. (that was me... lulz!)

Dirty fucking bastard was tricking underage girls into webcam shenanigans.

One bloody site, so many unhappy kids.

But in the midst of it all, and in the back of my mind has been my friends. In particular Oli, Marc and Anton. I've been giving so much of my time to fighting perverts at that shithole that I've been completely absent from those friends I really do love so much. (There's also the slight inconvenience of having to actually go into work and spend 8 or 9 hours at the office which I would otherwise have spent at home being pleasantly distracted, but hell, for double the pay, why not.)

So anyway, the upside of it is there's a bunch of new people to care about, in particular Justin, Andrew, Nick, Sara, Rory, Simon, Alej, Kat, Ray and Sue. It just makes me feel pretty low that I haven't been around at all for Oli, Marc, Wilbur, Mel and - and of course, His Lordship.


Anonymous said...

So you've recruited children in order to hector 'undesirables' in these so-described 'social networking sites'? You have them commit cyber crimes, such as for example hacking email accounts? Do you also enlist their services in order to draw out sexual predators? Have them engage in sexually explicit dialogue with these degenerates? Upon which they're obligated in posting the transcripts for your assessment? What are we to 'envision' here exactly? Perhaps you could enlighten us.

Anonymous said...

"His Lordship."

You've acquired an appetite for religious fervor?

ChatRat said...

Sooooo many presumptions based on sooooo much hatred and envy...

You have absolutely no idea about any of it, every time you get the oppotunity to engage with someone who's right there and knows all about it, you abuse him and send him packing...

Deliberate ignorance is the cancer that destroys societies.

"His Lordship" has nothing to do with religiosity at all. You're thinking of "His Grace" and I don't know any of those.

Bored at Liars Team HQ are we? How surprising? NOT.

Anonymous said...

Hatred and envy? How quizzical.

Certainly you should be held accountable for your own actions? Isn't that the standard to which adulthood and by extension, personal responsibility is measured?

You've taken it upon yourself to serve as a surrogate father to these children. Yet you've intimated to the readers of this blog that they've been conscripted to fight in the ongoing struggle with-- what appears-- linguistically crippled perverts.

Accountability and transparency would behoove you more than the callow recriminations of a child.

And for your information, the Christian deity is often referred to as 'Lord'. Lordship isn't far off, wouldn't you agree? The question remains standing.

ChatRat said...

The "question" does not still stand. You fucked up.

And again, you clearly have no clue what's going on. You are casting aspersions because you are sad, lonely and envious.

As for accountability for my own actions, I've invited you more than once to take me to task for my actions, you either will not or cannot. This is the limit of your adulthood - slinging mud based, no doubt, on acute awareness of your own deficiencies.

I am quite happy for anyone to do their own investigations into my activities. Why are you so afraid to do likewise?

Oh yeah.. you're deficient. lol.

Anonymous said...

What on earth are you on about? 'His grace' is chiefly used to designate royalty and bishops. Fruitless point of argument, if ever.

The remainder of your post once again contains a great deal of spiteful rancour. The practice of which-- vehemently denouncing your 'opponents' with callow recriminations and sordid gossip-- as stated before, does not endow you with the dignified stature of responsible adulthood, Paul. Such meritorious virtues are left to those that stand upright in the face of adversity, not to those that immediately warp, buckle and gnarl under even the slightest hint of duress.

You've often proclaimed that you're championing that which is right and just. Your actions however stand in flagrant testament against you.

Further more, accountability is achieved through taking responsibility for one's own actions. Your detractors, as well as your 'children', and their parents, stand ready in review. It's your task to redeem your reputation and thus far it has been an outright disgrace.