I've been accused of stalking. Stalking whom?
Where is the evidence? Stalking, as you well know, is a criminal offence. If you are serious about this accusation, I want the police involved IMMEDIATELY.
Admin's response:
Hi,
The stalked person is thinking of taking the legal action against you. The evidence is in the Netlog clan, in the lines when you call a certain user a weirdo and a homosexual pedophile.
sincerely,
the Netlog Team
So what, I'm in the process of taking legal action against Netlog. Doesn't mean the site gets shut down because I'm telling you about it.
The so called stalked person won't go to the police because he knows he'll end up in prison if he does. The man is a pedophile and Arnold and his mother will back me up on that and so will several other kids.
Let's see now... reinstate the Ratsback profile and I might - just might - consider not taking legal action against Netlog.
Hi,
I have re-reviewed your case. There might be not enough evidence to consider you stalking other users and we are extremely sorry for such not grounded well enough claim.
However, there is explicit proof that you offended other users of Netlog, and the reason for your being blocked has been adjusted accordingly.
Your profile could be reactivated only upon your strong promise not to breach our Code of Conduct, I'm afraid.
sincerely,
the Netlog Team
And to which profile are you referring when you offer to restore it? All I want from it is the evidence contained within.
Hi,
We are talking about the bigjohn92 profile. As for now, I do not offer anything - to be reviewed for the unblocking, we need to see the user's strong promise to improve, which is not the case here.
Here's the evidence for your offending other users: "homosexual pedophile and weirdo". Does that ring a bell to you? You posted such a message on one of Netlog clans.
sincerely,
the Netlog Team
Oh I don't care about the bigjohn92 profile. There's nothing in that which would be of interest to anyone that hasn't been previously stored elsewhere.
And the police file report number for the profile of its former owner who is now using the profile http://en.netlog.com/bigjohnrox is 19375 filed with Australian Crimestoppers last year.
I know there isn't a snowflake's chance in hell of you contacting Australian police to verify that for yourself because that would be tantamount to admitting liability.
As for the weirdo, I also know nobody at admin is about to look at Harry Larsson's MySpace page either so if you can't be bothered to look at the available evidence unless it appears in a helpdesk ticket like this, then I think it's about time you do face a reality check and have external forces pay you a visit - armed to the eyeballs with warrants.
Have an interesting day.
Saturday, May 31, 2008
Wayne the bullshit artist.
Online Doctor. I have decided to share a secret here. I used to run a site as Online Doctor. Please see www.freewebs.com/onlinedoctor
Bear in mind, I hava had just added new information on it as I am intenting to make it more public. How and why did I create the site?
Pay attention class; I want you to pick the massive hole in this explanation without any help from me.
During 2005, I was talking to a friend called Vicki (on MSN) and we were talking about religion. It was a pretty DEEP chat and she joked that I reminded her of Doctor Who.
(She's the first to say that but not the last). I've put Online Doctor as an MSN name for a joke. Until one day, there were a couple called Marie and Gary (the names has been changed). They lived together in the same house and they both speaks to me via MSN as they lived in Ireland, Dublin I think.
So, Marie has told me that she thinks that Gary is seeing someone else, because he was unusually late from work (and early to work).
Gary left the house a few times without letting Marie know. It was like that for weeks and weeks. So,. Gary spoke to me on MSN and explained why he was like that for a few weeks. He was secretly arrnaging a surprise wedding for Marie.
A what? You mean you can marry someone now without making arrangements with your intended spouse?
He plans to have the church ready, invited the family and friends to attend the wedding without her knowledge, and so on. The entire wedding plans were a big secret. Marie NEVER knew about this at all except for her friends and family.
Gary asked me to keep it as a secret and I promised him that I will help him out. Later on, Marie and I were talking again. I had simply told her that she MUST trust Gary 100% even he seems to be "up to no good". I explained to her that Gary does have a good reason to be sneaky and she need to trust him if she does truly love him.
Marie agreed to trust him. A few weeks later, Gary took Marie to a pre-arranged venue, a church, and to her surprise, everyone were there, all in their best outfits etc. Gary knelt and asked her to marry him.
Obviously, Marie said yes. So..they had a fantastic wedding.
Can anyone spot anything unusual with this?
Gary spoke to me again to say thank you for helping to keep things a secret and making sure Marie doesn't lose trust him in. He said "Wayne, you are Online Doctor". Touched by his comments, I've decided to use that name for a good purpose.
I usually enjoy dealing with people's problems, and I like to remain anonymous, like those superheroes, Superman, Batman, etc...they kept the identity hidden and help people out.
Superheroes, at least, wear underpants Wayne - even if they do wear them on the outside.
So, wanting to do the same thing, I've created Online Doctor website, with a new email address. It wasn't too successful as there wasn't enough exposure or publicity. I can't afford paying for a real website and such. The reason I have decided to go public with Online Doctor because a bully on here is pushing me into "public" eye.
So, I am going to take advantages of that. The Online Doctor is not a secret anymore, and EVERY actions will be revealed on Netlog. If the bully think it's wrong to be modest and remain anonymous. I am NOT interested in praises, grattitudes, compliments. I usually enjoy sorting people's problems and then go away and get on with someone else's problems.
However, I did adverise the site once on Netlog, one of them was on Pervert Alert. I did avoid at first explaining it was me (on guestbooks etc) so, I decided to reveal the identity to Narissa (Owner of Pervert Alert).
Actually Wayne, you quit the clan when you were pressed on the subject and that's when you started whining about being bullied.
I have revealed it to her via private message so she knows. Now, the secret is out, and watch this speace for the Netlog Version of Online Doctor. Yes, everything is public on that site so I can't be accused for "hiding" things. More blogs to come about me...
Part 3: Dual MSN accounts: The fact and reasons
Part 4: My sexuality: No longer private and why.
Part 5: How do I know the members of Netlog.
Netlog, the safest haven for pedophiles on the internet.
Hi, I am sick and tired of you posting those kind of blogs. If you have an explicit proof that somebody is abusing underage, please let me know. Otherwise I will not hesitate to block you permanently.
I know that you like to run those campaigns on your profile, they attract attention and everything. In this respect, however, I cannot agree on that. I am not saying that this guy is innocent.
Nevertheless you just cannot go on like this. Please show me EXPLICIT evidence and I will get him blocked.
TomekMy response to Tomek....
Ok, JCBoilvr... convicted pedophile by the name of John Curry. He's been
reported before and he's still here. You can find his rap sheet on the Florida
Sex Offender Regsitry. http://en.netlog.com/jcboilvrhttp://de.netlog.com/thorsten_in_fr I warned you about this
guy back in January - yet he's still here. My most recent blog has nothing
whatsoever to do with Wayne Adams, Tomasz, I'm telling you that you do not have
control over your site.
Non-English clans and profiles proliferate here
and you as clans manager are manifestly incapable of enforcing the Code of
Conduct of this website. How on earth would you propose to prove me wrong on
that?
The link to the search term "Teen" in the video section of this
website is littered with pornography. Personally I couldn't care less about it
but unless management cleans things up, I will go to the press - and I will do
it BECAUSE profiles of those who are pursuing kids are not dealt with in any
sort of satisfactory manner.
Sam Smith is a prime case in point. As for
Wayne Adams, I have what you describe as "hearsay" evidence from kids who've
told me what he's like, what he does - all of it. I managed to track down all of
his old profile names so if you google the following terms, you'll see
everything he's done since he's been here - but you have to look at the cached
pages.
klown1975
mintcooker
mruncrushable
religionnutter1975
captainblogger
the_great_saint
the_great_writer
For me,
mruncrushable yielded the best results. When I see kids and adults comment that
they don't know how to report abuse, how do you propose to get EXPLICIT
evidence?
All you're going to get is hearsay. Look at Lorenz's guestbook
for the comments by rubyrednics... is that hearsay as well? Add up the hearsay
and circumstantial evidence and use some commonsense and take advantage of the
Terms and Conditions which clearly state accounts can be blocked without warning
or explanation and clean the predators out of your website.
It's too
late to think of attempting to permanently block me, Tomasz. For starters, I'll
get around it in no time flat using any one of half a dozen means at my
disposal. You know it and I know it.
Secondly, more people are going to
be on your case asking the very same questions if my issues are not dealt with.
All you'll achieve by blocking me is the destruction of evidence within this
profile.So they've blocked all of my profiles there now - the ones they're aware of that is - they still don't know about a few of the ones I still have - and CEOP, bless their cotton socks, have just published their expectations of the responsibilities of social networking sites.
Because Netlog is also in breach of U.S. law, I'm also going to ask some of my American friends to report the site to U.S. Authorities.
Thursday, May 29, 2008
The continuing war with Netlog.
I had my account at Netlog blocked and the clans manager sent me the following email:
The correspondence has been flying thick and fast between me and admin because of what's been happening there. It was because of what was going on at Netlog that I made The Daily Rat website which I had to stop doing because some twats were warning the filth we were going after.
http://chatrat.977mb.com is the url.
One they forgot to warn was Darryl Rowe from Adelaide who was arrested in February and has his computer confiscated.
Anyway, the clans manager had this to say in a locked clan at Netlog...
It is not of a private nature at all and the person in question would be only too pleased to have the reasons published for everyone to see. It is the opinion of the person in question that it is Netlog admin who would prefer to have the whole issue kept quiet.
Actually, this person was acting like the CoC does not apply to the administration of this site and numerous examples were posted to confirm that hypothesis. To refresh the memories of those who may be reading this...
From the CoC:
This is the English version of Netlog. To enable moderation, you can post blogs, videos, comments... in English only.
http://en.netlog.com/go/explore/clans/view=popu...-
Furthermore the Terms and Conditions of this website have this to say about membership here:
"Netlog is at liberty to cancel your membership at any time, for any reason and without previous warning."
You, however, keep LYING to us by saying you need proof before you can take any action. Your own terms and conditions CLEARLY STATE OTHERWISE.
Spend just 3 minutes looking through this clan and see if you can justify to the kids here why you blocked Rat for going after someone you yourself consider has no credibility yet all these real criminals are allowed to carry on as if nobody in admin cares how many kids the creeps try to get on webcam.
The following response was posted this morning:
I'm making just one point - and that point is you do NOT have control of the site.
Say what you like about me being inconsistent, abusive or whatever - it doesn't change the fact that you do not have any control over this site. The proof we in this clan offer is not sufficient proof for you. We obviously have different standards.
The further proof I show in support of my assertion that you do not have control of this site is discounted on the base of it not being related to the safety of kids.
I reiterate: You do NOT have control of this site and THAT makes it intrinsically unsafe for kids. Your attitude makes it worse. You are aware you are in breach of U.S. law right now aren't you. That has ramifications for Netlog.
And one more thing: Just exactly what sort of dialogue would you be thinking of entertaining with the sorts of people we name here in this clan?
There is a whole lot more that I've thrown at this person and as I get time, I'll post it.
Hello Paul Ritchie,
Your Netlog account has been blocked by a Netlog moderator.
The moderator gave this reason:
After numerous incidents and reports from other Netlog users, we have decided that there is a substantial number of evidence that has led us to the conclusion that your account requires blocking. Apart from the major cases of disturbing the public order on the site your inappropriate conduct also includes: -running (in the past) a fake profile of an underage boy the pictures on that profile come from unknown source and they definitely resemble numerous pictures so often reported by yourself -slanderous behaviour towards numerous users of Netlog, -foul language, -publishing false accusations based on assumptions rather than credible evidence -lack of willingness to cooperate with the admin
The correspondence has been flying thick and fast between me and admin because of what's been happening there. It was because of what was going on at Netlog that I made The Daily Rat website which I had to stop doing because some twats were warning the filth we were going after.
http://chatrat.977mb.com is the url.
One they forgot to warn was Darryl Rowe from Adelaide who was arrested in February and has his computer confiscated.
Anyway, the clans manager had this to say in a locked clan at Netlog...
You know that I do not post in this clan, however I feel that you guys should know what I think about some of the issues that have been raised in other blog messages in PA.To which I responded with:
Please excuse me writing a separate blog message. I just want to make it very clear to everybody.
All users, who ever took the chance to talk to me, know that I would never use any credentials given to me to log in for some other users. Please do not say that I have the password to any account if you sent it to me totally unprompted. I did not, do not and will not log in for any other users and any accounts other than Tomek2006.
As for the blocking of the account of "Ratsback". I do not want to publish the whole reasoning here as it is of private nature and I am not sure whether the person in question would like everybody to read it or not. I believe that it was well-reasoned and certainly the account had not been blocked for nothing. This person has been acting like the CoC does not apply to him. It might be easier to fight abuse using dirty tricks but this makes it really difficult to tell one apart from a real abuser.
Another important thing I would like everybody to know is that:
I am always happy to talk to you and if you send me a pm there is a big chance that I will respond. Nevertheless, I receive hundreds of messages every day and sending me pms with regard to urgent and abuse-attached issues is not the best way to solve the problem. All of you who ever tried to cooperate with the admin team know that writing the Helpdesk should get you a prompt and helpful response.
I hope that this sheds some light on the whole issue.
As for the blocking of the account of "Ratsback". I do not want to publish the whole reasoning here as it is of private nature and I am not sure whether the person in question would like everybody to read it or not.
It is not of a private nature at all and the person in question would be only too pleased to have the reasons published for everyone to see. It is the opinion of the person in question that it is Netlog admin who would prefer to have the whole issue kept quiet.
This person has been acting like the CoC does not apply to him. It might be easier to fight abuse using dirty tricks but this makes it really difficult to tell one apart from a real abuser.
Actually, this person was acting like the CoC does not apply to the administration of this site and numerous examples were posted to confirm that hypothesis. To refresh the memories of those who may be reading this...
From the CoC:
This is the English version of Netlog. To enable moderation, you can post blogs, videos, comments... in English only.
http://en.netlog.com/go/explore/clans/view=popu...-
Furthermore the Terms and Conditions of this website have this to say about membership here:
"Netlog is at liberty to cancel your membership at any time, for any reason and without previous warning."
You, however, keep LYING to us by saying you need proof before you can take any action. Your own terms and conditions CLEARLY STATE OTHERWISE.
Spend just 3 minutes looking through this clan and see if you can justify to the kids here why you blocked Rat for going after someone you yourself consider has no credibility yet all these real criminals are allowed to carry on as if nobody in admin cares how many kids the creeps try to get on webcam.
The following response was posted this morning:
My response to this "shoot the messenger" mentality:
1. Let's not be hypocritical. Go ahead and publish the e-mail you received when I blocked your account under the name Ratsback. I just have ;) I strongly believe that it has strong reasoning and it is just. I don't.
2. Again due to the lack of reasonable arguments you try to use foreign clans. The security of children and clans in languages other than English are two separate issues on Netlog. Show me a clan that is against the CoC that has been reported and was not blocked. If you are going to act like this it is way more destructive than constructive.
3.Indeed such a point exists in the TOS of Netlog. I could possibly enforce this rule on your account. Nevertheless we always try to look for dialog and mutual understanding. When it comes to the parts where you do good you act like you are the most caring person on Netlog, however when it comes to the parts where you act just like a regular abuser, running fake accounts of children, posting slanderous accusations etc..... you simply say that you never said you were nice. Is this consistent?
I am on good terms with so many users who want to fight abuse. I think this is sad that finding a mutual understanding with you seems impossible. I do not think that I am the one to blame for that though.
I think that what I wrote here is a hard nut. Please do not respond before thinking about it seriously. I will not go into a regular argument anyways.
I'm making just one point - and that point is you do NOT have control of the site.
Say what you like about me being inconsistent, abusive or whatever - it doesn't change the fact that you do not have any control over this site. The proof we in this clan offer is not sufficient proof for you. We obviously have different standards.
The further proof I show in support of my assertion that you do not have control of this site is discounted on the base of it not being related to the safety of kids.
I reiterate: You do NOT have control of this site and THAT makes it intrinsically unsafe for kids. Your attitude makes it worse. You are aware you are in breach of U.S. law right now aren't you. That has ramifications for Netlog.
And one more thing: Just exactly what sort of dialogue would you be thinking of entertaining with the sorts of people we name here in this clan?
There is a whole lot more that I've thrown at this person and as I get time, I'll post it.
Sunday, April 13, 2008
The_Great_Saint:
I wasn't interested in your profile. I was told about those blogs you have put up about me. Did you know that some members of PA are my friends and checks my profile and logs regularly?
Do I care?
- The_Great_Saint:
I encouraged them to take a look. They has testified that there is nothing wrong with me.
Testified? Where? Which court? Did you show them your chatlogs from instant messenger? I bet you didn't. Conspiracy to commit assault is a criminal offence - and it's your chatlog so you can't deny it. Conspiracy to commit assault against a 16 year old... how do you justify that?
- The_Great_Saint:
I was checking your blogs and gave the links to the Netlog Admin as evidence of slander.
What slander? You're a liar, and all the evidence I have - though it doesn't amount to what Admin calls "proof" points quite clearly to the fact you're a pedophile. I'm presently trawling through more than 680 messages and 5 months of chatlogs to compile a sizeable dossier of activity you wouldn't want your Netlog friends to know about.
- The_Great_Saint:
The Admin had written to me if you had evidence then your blogs wouldn't be removed. Thank you for removing the false blogs about me.
Don't thank me, I removed them under duress. And when I get the time to provide proof sufficient to Admin's requirements, those blogs will be reposted. Thank you for playing.
- The_Great_Saint:
Of course I had you blacklisted to prevent you from twisting the truth up.
Truth? Do you know the meaning of the word? You told one 14yo that you don't talk to kids that age. You spoken to Arnold lately? You remember, the 13yo you considered the coolest person you'd met in all of 2007...
- The_Great_Saint:
I wasn't interested in talking to you or making a fuss with you.
I bet you weren't. I'd pwn you to oblivion and you know it.
- The_Great_Saint:
I know you takes a delight in reaction and I didn't even bother giving you a reaction,
Not to my face, but chatlogs are a bastard aren't they - and guess what - I have them. You wouldn't take me on personally so you grizzled and griped to teenagers you thought were on your side and guess what, some them hate you more than do I. 5 months worth of them to be exact. (They'd be the ones I'm going through now for information they've given me about you and others.)
- The_Great_Saint:
and you had to get my friends attention to read your blogs.
Erm, not quite. I googled your old profile names and followed half a dozen messages you'd left on the guestbooks and pictures of teenager after teenager after teenager... see, that's one of the ways I found out that you don't just randomly search profiles. Nobody was over 18. You're 33. If it looks like a turd and smells like a turd, chances are, it's a turd. Change your profile name? The_Great_Turd?
- The_Great_Saint:
Guess what? They decided to stand up for me in their own free will. I didnt even ask them what to do.
Well actually you did. I have that chatlog as well. Jonas might not have but that's ok, I admire the fact he stood up for someone he thinks is a mate. Does he know about your dual messenger regime? Does he know about your webcam requests of 13 and 14 year olds? I bet he doesn't.
- The_Great_Saint:
They wanted to show support. Now, please remove EVERYTHING you has said, written, or anything like into it, I will simply report you. You will lose your account. JUST ONE WORD ABOUT ME, MY NAME, OR ANYTHING. it is reported.
Shit?
- The_Great_Saint:
Simple as that. Like or not. Don't even be tempted to get clever with me or find a way to answer back. It is proven it is a slander and that's is that.
If it's a proven slander, then take legal action against me. I DARE YOU, Oscar Wilde.
I DOUBLE DARE YOU.
WITH SPRINKLES ON TOP.
- The_Great_Saint:
So, remove everything from me, and if you EVER think about using your friends or "other contacts" to accuse me, think again, it WILL be you and Netlog Admin already knows that.
half a mo.. the words are English but I'll be buggered if I can make head or tail of this.
- The_Great_Saint:
I gave them full report and history about you. Of course some of PA members trusted you, but now they're thinking again and helped me to report you.
Hmmm.. I doubt it. See, I'm still a member there and you're not. How's that work?
- The_Great_Saint:
Remember, not a single word against me again. I am deleting my account. If I catch a small whiff coming from you on netlog, you're blocked. Like it or not. Yes, I have several friends on netlog and they are not even on my friends list and they are keeping an eye on you now. One more move. It's over for you.
Oh dear god I'm shaking in my boots. Do you know what happens to people who get their Netlog accounts blocked? They make new ones within 3 minutes.
Understand this, you retard, for as long as you keep searching the profiles here for local teenage boys to contact, I am going to know about it. You want me off your case, then you quit being a sleezy git, start being honest and up front about your sexuality and stop telling the kids with whom they can and cannot be friends.
I wasn't interested in your profile. I was told about those blogs you have put up about me. Did you know that some members of PA are my friends and checks my profile and logs regularly?
Do I care?
- The_Great_Saint:
I encouraged them to take a look. They has testified that there is nothing wrong with me.
Testified? Where? Which court? Did you show them your chatlogs from instant messenger? I bet you didn't. Conspiracy to commit assault is a criminal offence - and it's your chatlog so you can't deny it. Conspiracy to commit assault against a 16 year old... how do you justify that?
- The_Great_Saint:
I was checking your blogs and gave the links to the Netlog Admin as evidence of slander.
What slander? You're a liar, and all the evidence I have - though it doesn't amount to what Admin calls "proof" points quite clearly to the fact you're a pedophile. I'm presently trawling through more than 680 messages and 5 months of chatlogs to compile a sizeable dossier of activity you wouldn't want your Netlog friends to know about.
- The_Great_Saint:
The Admin had written to me if you had evidence then your blogs wouldn't be removed. Thank you for removing the false blogs about me.
Don't thank me, I removed them under duress. And when I get the time to provide proof sufficient to Admin's requirements, those blogs will be reposted. Thank you for playing.
- The_Great_Saint:
Of course I had you blacklisted to prevent you from twisting the truth up.
Truth? Do you know the meaning of the word? You told one 14yo that you don't talk to kids that age. You spoken to Arnold lately? You remember, the 13yo you considered the coolest person you'd met in all of 2007...
- The_Great_Saint:
I wasn't interested in talking to you or making a fuss with you.
I bet you weren't. I'd pwn you to oblivion and you know it.
- The_Great_Saint:
I know you takes a delight in reaction and I didn't even bother giving you a reaction,
Not to my face, but chatlogs are a bastard aren't they - and guess what - I have them. You wouldn't take me on personally so you grizzled and griped to teenagers you thought were on your side and guess what, some them hate you more than do I. 5 months worth of them to be exact. (They'd be the ones I'm going through now for information they've given me about you and others.)
- The_Great_Saint:
and you had to get my friends attention to read your blogs.
Erm, not quite. I googled your old profile names and followed half a dozen messages you'd left on the guestbooks and pictures of teenager after teenager after teenager... see, that's one of the ways I found out that you don't just randomly search profiles. Nobody was over 18. You're 33. If it looks like a turd and smells like a turd, chances are, it's a turd. Change your profile name? The_Great_Turd?
- The_Great_Saint:
Guess what? They decided to stand up for me in their own free will. I didnt even ask them what to do.
Well actually you did. I have that chatlog as well. Jonas might not have but that's ok, I admire the fact he stood up for someone he thinks is a mate. Does he know about your dual messenger regime? Does he know about your webcam requests of 13 and 14 year olds? I bet he doesn't.
- The_Great_Saint:
They wanted to show support. Now, please remove EVERYTHING you has said, written, or anything like into it, I will simply report you. You will lose your account. JUST ONE WORD ABOUT ME, MY NAME, OR ANYTHING. it is reported.
Shit?
- The_Great_Saint:
Simple as that. Like or not. Don't even be tempted to get clever with me or find a way to answer back. It is proven it is a slander and that's is that.
If it's a proven slander, then take legal action against me. I DARE YOU, Oscar Wilde.
I DOUBLE DARE YOU.
WITH SPRINKLES ON TOP.
- The_Great_Saint:
So, remove everything from me, and if you EVER think about using your friends or "other contacts" to accuse me, think again, it WILL be you and Netlog Admin already knows that.
half a mo.. the words are English but I'll be buggered if I can make head or tail of this.
- The_Great_Saint:
I gave them full report and history about you. Of course some of PA members trusted you, but now they're thinking again and helped me to report you.
Hmmm.. I doubt it. See, I'm still a member there and you're not. How's that work?
- The_Great_Saint:
Remember, not a single word against me again. I am deleting my account. If I catch a small whiff coming from you on netlog, you're blocked. Like it or not. Yes, I have several friends on netlog and they are not even on my friends list and they are keeping an eye on you now. One more move. It's over for you.
Oh dear god I'm shaking in my boots. Do you know what happens to people who get their Netlog accounts blocked? They make new ones within 3 minutes.
Understand this, you retard, for as long as you keep searching the profiles here for local teenage boys to contact, I am going to know about it. You want me off your case, then you quit being a sleezy git, start being honest and up front about your sexuality and stop telling the kids with whom they can and cannot be friends.
Dear Wayne,
Yesterday my account was blocked by Admin and I had to remove two blog posts accusing a certain individual of being a pedophile in order to get my account back.
They called it "slander".
It's only slander if what you say is not true. Just consult any biography of Oscar Wilde.
I'm just BEGGING for one of those slimy two-faced cowards to get me into court somewhere.
Still staggers the imagination that slander is considered so serious an offence against the code of conduct it warrants blocking but the solicitation of 13 and 14 year olds for sex does not warrant any action at all.
Since when does a reputation on a social networking site count for more than the health and safety of a child? My reputation is lower than shark shit; I'm a trouble maker and a vigilante. Does it bug me at all?
Dream on.
The boast that only 1 - 3% of pictures considered too taboo to post, thereby proving how up to the job admin is of safeguarding the public sensibilities also looks abjectly ridiculous in light of the fact that even scumbags convicted of sex offences against children and people identifying themselves as pedophiles can lurk there and solicit kids with impugnity, largely because kids don't know how to report abuse. It comes down to more than just clicking an obscure link - which doesn't even work on one's own profile.
A----y...
Stuff happened in the last few days for which I wasn't adequately prepared. It was all good stuff though; I met in person, after 2 years' corresponding on the internet, the only woman who's managed to understand me properly since the death of my brother; one of my fellow pedohunters, a man of whom I am in absolute awe, renewed the acquaintance last Friday and put me in touch with another chap dedicated to hunting and arresting perverts who has massive legal and financial backing to do what he does; and the crew all turned up with new bits and pieces to get other stuff done in the quest of hunting creeps and perverts.
It's like it's all falling into place all at the same time.
And one poncy friggin git gets his undies in a bind and complains that I've slandered him and I have to justify myself for exposing the crump's lies and telling the truth about him.
Well Jesus Christ almighty, if I'm that bloody bad, how about you just piss off back to bebo and solicit kids there, you fat maggot bastard. Why do you need two sites to hunt for teenage boys. I know where the bebo account is as well, spoil what I'm doing in one site and I'll trash that account there for you as well. Get the hint, dickhead; as long as you hunt for kids half your age, I'm going to hunt you wherever you are.
Anonymous does not forget. Anonymous does not forgive.
STOP SEARCHING FOR NEW KIDS TO CONTACT. WE ALL KNOW YOU DO IT, WE ALL KNOW YOU LIE ABOUT WHY YOU'RE CONTACTING THEM, AND EVEN THAT YOU DO CONTACT KIDS.
JUST STOP DOING IT. GOT IT?
They called it "slander".
It's only slander if what you say is not true. Just consult any biography of Oscar Wilde.
I'm just BEGGING for one of those slimy two-faced cowards to get me into court somewhere.
Still staggers the imagination that slander is considered so serious an offence against the code of conduct it warrants blocking but the solicitation of 13 and 14 year olds for sex does not warrant any action at all.
Since when does a reputation on a social networking site count for more than the health and safety of a child? My reputation is lower than shark shit; I'm a trouble maker and a vigilante. Does it bug me at all?
Dream on.
The boast that only 1 - 3% of pictures considered too taboo to post, thereby proving how up to the job admin is of safeguarding the public sensibilities also looks abjectly ridiculous in light of the fact that even scumbags convicted of sex offences against children and people identifying themselves as pedophiles can lurk there and solicit kids with impugnity, largely because kids don't know how to report abuse. It comes down to more than just clicking an obscure link - which doesn't even work on one's own profile.
A----y...
Stuff happened in the last few days for which I wasn't adequately prepared. It was all good stuff though; I met in person, after 2 years' corresponding on the internet, the only woman who's managed to understand me properly since the death of my brother; one of my fellow pedohunters, a man of whom I am in absolute awe, renewed the acquaintance last Friday and put me in touch with another chap dedicated to hunting and arresting perverts who has massive legal and financial backing to do what he does; and the crew all turned up with new bits and pieces to get other stuff done in the quest of hunting creeps and perverts.
It's like it's all falling into place all at the same time.
And one poncy friggin git gets his undies in a bind and complains that I've slandered him and I have to justify myself for exposing the crump's lies and telling the truth about him.
Well Jesus Christ almighty, if I'm that bloody bad, how about you just piss off back to bebo and solicit kids there, you fat maggot bastard. Why do you need two sites to hunt for teenage boys. I know where the bebo account is as well, spoil what I'm doing in one site and I'll trash that account there for you as well. Get the hint, dickhead; as long as you hunt for kids half your age, I'm going to hunt you wherever you are.
Anonymous does not forget. Anonymous does not forgive.
STOP SEARCHING FOR NEW KIDS TO CONTACT. WE ALL KNOW YOU DO IT, WE ALL KNOW YOU LIE ABOUT WHY YOU'RE CONTACTING THEM, AND EVEN THAT YOU DO CONTACT KIDS.
JUST STOP DOING IT. GOT IT?
Friday, March 21, 2008
My god some people are dumb.
Wonder dickhead John Curry asked me if I'd told one of his "friends" that he, Curry, is a pervert.
Staggers the imagination considering the groups of which I'm a member or moderator.
John, you maggot, I told your friend that you are a convicted pedophile in the state of Florida, I gave your friend directions how to find you and I gave your friend a link to the page I made just for you and about you so anyone and everyone can see for themselves that you are worthless filth whose existence is anathema to the human condition.
You should become an hero immediately. Sooner if you can.
Not only are you a baby-raping scum of the worst possible kind, you are astonishingly stupid with it and all. You are less intellectually endowed than a rotten cabbage. When you do decide to become an hero, shoot yourself in the heart. If you put a bullet in your head, it wouldn't do any lasting damage.
Staggers the imagination considering the groups of which I'm a member or moderator.
John, you maggot, I told your friend that you are a convicted pedophile in the state of Florida, I gave your friend directions how to find you and I gave your friend a link to the page I made just for you and about you so anyone and everyone can see for themselves that you are worthless filth whose existence is anathema to the human condition.
You should become an hero immediately. Sooner if you can.
Not only are you a baby-raping scum of the worst possible kind, you are astonishingly stupid with it and all. You are less intellectually endowed than a rotten cabbage. When you do decide to become an hero, shoot yourself in the heart. If you put a bullet in your head, it wouldn't do any lasting damage.
Monday, February 25, 2008
Still at it...
When I did my Swamp newsletters years ago, one of them was about Telstra's business practices.
Looking over an ABC Online forum this morning, I found this little entry concerning Telstra call centres...
I don't know what the rest of this was going to say, but I just wanted to add that Telstra's call centres include a "Retention" department, a department designed to keep disaffected subscribers from moving to other companies. It's the role of Retention to (obviously) churn them back to Telstra during the mandatory cooling off period.
In my time at Dodo Internet, home of the very worst customer service ever, the Retention department was bigger than the sales department - who were all expected to meet or exceed their sales targets. Seems to me that if they paid more attention to providing customer service, they wouldn't need to spend nearly as much trying to keep customers who want to leave for greener pastures.
Looking over an ABC Online forum this morning, I found this little entry concerning Telstra call centres...
Well done!! A very accurate portrayal of the evironment with the Telstra Call Centre. I worked for Telstra for the last 7 years before being made redundant at the end of last year and most of that time I was in a Call Centre. My sincerest sympathy goes out to the families who lost thier loved ones.
It is generally the people who take pride in the standard of thier work who suffer the most in this enviroment. If you really do want to help people and are not motivated by the buck but really want to provide good customer service then it is a real challenge to stay sane in this organisation. In saying that there are still may wonderful people still there raising these matters with management on a day to day basis who are still fighting to be heard.
It may suprise most customers but it is generally the consultants in the Call Centres and the staff in contact with customers on a day to day basis who fight the hardest for customers rights! They are the ones who will generally have to listen to the complaints so believe me when I say, if the company makes a decission that they beielve will not be recieved well by the customer they fight hard for you.
While Mr Rolland makes the point that there has to be measures that are required for scheduling, which is necessary, however, it is how these measures are put in place that makes the difference. You are expected address the customers initial enquiry and then look for opportunities to up sell or cross sell to every customer, and do all of this in an average of 300- 600 seconds or there abouts. This does does not leave a lot of time for customer service. If this time frame was increased then it would mean that you would need MORE staff to answer the amount of calls that they anticipate at any given time, which is why they do not want to increase this target.
Inevitably, this means that a consultant will hurry through the basics of your call, try and sell you something and then get you off the phone. If your initial enquiry is too difficult then they will "transfer you to another area" rather then get stuck with a complex enquiry and move on the next sale. Then someone else has to take then call that has just been transferred. It's called the Telstra Two step. In my expereince, most customers just want their enquiry dealth with efficently and to have it done right the first time. If the managers would realise this, there may not be so many mistakes and therfore there would be less phones calls to deal with when people have to ring back 3 or 4 times toget something fixed. And the more angry and frustrated a customer is the longer the call is going to take!
While the internal message is Customer first, all of the targets and incentives are sales based and sales focused and there is very little recognition for customer service. Generally the people who really do want to help people and provide excellent customer service are the o
I don't know what the rest of this was going to say, but I just wanted to add that Telstra's call centres include a "Retention" department, a department designed to keep disaffected subscribers from moving to other companies. It's the role of Retention to (obviously) churn them back to Telstra during the mandatory cooling off period.
In my time at Dodo Internet, home of the very worst customer service ever, the Retention department was bigger than the sales department - who were all expected to meet or exceed their sales targets. Seems to me that if they paid more attention to providing customer service, they wouldn't need to spend nearly as much trying to keep customers who want to leave for greener pastures.
Sunday, February 10, 2008
Another one bites the dust.
Darryl the fat pedo scumbag in Adelaide's southern suburbs got arrested this week and has had his computer seized.
Sux to be you, Darryl. Become an hero? It's really not as bad as you think.
Despite the Sunday Mail having had the story in its pipeline for only a couple of weeks, it's one on which I've been working since late last year. We got him booted out of his SNS and that would have been an end of it except for the fact he came back and one of the kids found him and then I found him.
It didn't take all that long to find "evidence" on one site but it wasn't good enough. It was only by watching and following his comments that we managed to get his msn and from there, his membership of 4 networking sites which led to his arrest this week.
One of the kids got him to tell us when he'd be returning from a holiday in New Zealand too so it was a nice welcome home - for us anyway. lol
This story was especially pleasing because one of my haters alerted Darryl to the page I made for him on my website. He deleted 2 of the accounts I put up in there but his other two accounts are still active. That kinda tells me that he didn't think my reach would extend into his offline world. I have every confidence in the ability of police to retrieve any information he might have tried to delete from his hard drive too.
And I'll be watching his other profiles to see if they mysteriously disappear or have info added to them to the affect that he's been busted.
I really just hope he kills himself while he's out on bail. It's been known to happen in the past and word of his arrest and the reasons for it are bound to get around his football club and tennis club and elsewhere which should deprive him of all his support networks. Becoming an hero would be in his best interests.
He's out on bail, that means he's very unlikely to get a custodial sentence if the police press charges and he's convicted. But I'm not finished with Darryl yet.
The kid who put me on his trail was only 13 at the time. Justice in South Australia might determine his debt to South Australians but I'm not South Australian and neither is that 13yo.
Det-Sgt Peter Rodney of the South Australian Sexual Crime Investigation Branch may be in receipt of more information on Darryl before this gets to court if I have anything to do with it.
Sux to be you, Darryl. Become an hero? It's really not as bad as you think.
Despite the Sunday Mail having had the story in its pipeline for only a couple of weeks, it's one on which I've been working since late last year. We got him booted out of his SNS and that would have been an end of it except for the fact he came back and one of the kids found him and then I found him.
It didn't take all that long to find "evidence" on one site but it wasn't good enough. It was only by watching and following his comments that we managed to get his msn and from there, his membership of 4 networking sites which led to his arrest this week.
One of the kids got him to tell us when he'd be returning from a holiday in New Zealand too so it was a nice welcome home - for us anyway. lol
This story was especially pleasing because one of my haters alerted Darryl to the page I made for him on my website. He deleted 2 of the accounts I put up in there but his other two accounts are still active. That kinda tells me that he didn't think my reach would extend into his offline world. I have every confidence in the ability of police to retrieve any information he might have tried to delete from his hard drive too.
And I'll be watching his other profiles to see if they mysteriously disappear or have info added to them to the affect that he's been busted.
I really just hope he kills himself while he's out on bail. It's been known to happen in the past and word of his arrest and the reasons for it are bound to get around his football club and tennis club and elsewhere which should deprive him of all his support networks. Becoming an hero would be in his best interests.
He's out on bail, that means he's very unlikely to get a custodial sentence if the police press charges and he's convicted. But I'm not finished with Darryl yet.
The kid who put me on his trail was only 13 at the time. Justice in South Australia might determine his debt to South Australians but I'm not South Australian and neither is that 13yo.
Det-Sgt Peter Rodney of the South Australian Sexual Crime Investigation Branch may be in receipt of more information on Darryl before this gets to court if I have anything to do with it.
Friday, February 08, 2008
Remember SoClear?
No, it's not the Church of Scientology's latest skin care package, it's a worldwide pedo information exchange on Yahoo. They have a creepy beyond belief channel on YouTube that makes this writer feel like switching YouTube off. (Even though I never clicked on even one of Bong's links.)
Well, it looks like they've got their own messageboard now - called SoFightBack.
It started this week by the look of it, has only 5 members and 3 posts so far, but one of those members is ELP.
EVERYONE in the anti-pedo community should know who ELP is. He's almost as much part and parcel of that crowd as was DLW who got jailed late last year.
Having just looked over the Wikisposure page, I noticed neither of those two creeps has a listing.
Come on Pee-J, I thought you were the best in the world. Maybe I got that wrong and the only kids you care about are American kids.
Fancy that because DLW is VERY famous. He was one of the first to bitch about Justin Berry turning state's evidence (laying all the blame on Justin of course - DLW is a pedophile, therefore he's as cowardly as they all are).
Well, it looks like they've got their own messageboard now - called SoFightBack.
It started this week by the look of it, has only 5 members and 3 posts so far, but one of those members is ELP.
EVERYONE in the anti-pedo community should know who ELP is. He's almost as much part and parcel of that crowd as was DLW who got jailed late last year.
Having just looked over the Wikisposure page, I noticed neither of those two creeps has a listing.
Come on Pee-J, I thought you were the best in the world. Maybe I got that wrong and the only kids you care about are American kids.
Fancy that because DLW is VERY famous. He was one of the first to bitch about Justin Berry turning state's evidence (laying all the blame on Justin of course - DLW is a pedophile, therefore he's as cowardly as they all are).That's David Williams, the pedo maggot scumbag.
Not so chipper now, are you David.
Cunt.
Wish I could remember who put that arrest on the board.
Anyway, in other news, the Australian Federal Police rang me from Canberra on Wednesday about a report I filed in the UK about a month ago.
The hardest part of reporting stuff you've seen happening to other people's kids is that without the incident being reported by the kids themselves, there's not a hell of a lot to go on. And when the kids won't even talk to their parents about what's happened, what hope is there of getting them to talk to police?
This one affects me personally because the kid did so much to improve the situation - didn't just sit there being a victim, didn't just 'let things take their course and deal with it as best you can'. This was one brave kid who just doesn't happen to have parental backing when it comes to taking the steps vital to prevent the same thing from happening to other kids.
My crew and I are also in touch with CEOP for a manual on the best way to secure the arrest of online predators. This is where my crew differ from Pee-J. My crew aren't just trained adults. They're fairly savvy adults and they're kids from 14 - 17 who are turning the tables on perverted filthbags by KNOWING WHAT TO DO WHEN A PERVERT STARTS A CHAT.
Yes, that's right. Perverts don't just mistakenly chat to undercover Pee-J operatives, perverts actually chat to real kids as well. The standard advice is "block them, delete them, report abuse."
Erm, pardon me but fuck off.
The kids in my crew are fed to the back teeth of that kind of 'action' and they're so fed up with perverts hitting on them they want to take active steps to prevent it. The stupid 1950's patriarchal attitude goes something along the lines of "This is no job for a kid, let an adult take care of it."
But what happens when a kid hands it over to an adult?
Bloody nothing of course, because the adults have bugger all idea what to do about it either. So, I've got a bunch of people - including kids - who WANT to take action so by Christ I'm going to do whatever I can to make sure if or when the time comes, they know exactly what to do in order to maximise the possibility of getting a pervert arrested.
Oh... Sorry Phillip, that's the non-American way of doing business on the internet. You don't wait for the nursemaid to clean up, you learn to clean up for yourself.
Sunday, January 20, 2008
Another site
I've been trialing freehosting websites for the last few weeks before I transfer a finished product to my own domain.
Most of them are complete crap, which I sort of expected but I did at least expect to be able to upload and update the site contents as and when I wanted.
They all have the same cPanel editing which is geared to complete novices at web design which didn't suit me at all, so I design the site on my desktop then upload it as code when the page is done. No problems.
Well... that is until I opened the site in Firefox and IE and noticed the vast difference in layout between the two browsers, then the browser hacking started and it took me 4 hours to get rid of as many bugs and tweak the code so it presents almost identically in both browsers.
I tried to upload the code in 2 of the 5 free hosting sites I picked and one just wouldn't even let me into the cPanel environment.
The other, after wrestling with the code, I joined the host's forum and made a note of how much of a bitch it was manipulating the css to cater for the different browsers and lo and behold, when I signed in tonight to do more updating, the best site of the 5 I've tried fixed up the css issue and now it's twice as easy and convenient as it was before.
So, if you're looking for a free webhosting service with no banner ads, no pop-ups or pop-unders, I seriously suggest trotting along to 977mb.com and signing up.
Sure there are hosts with more space allowance; I got ones with 2gb, 5gb and 10gb but what's the point when almost 1gb is more than enough for what I'm doing and the site actually works and the admins are on the ball and responsive.
I've got a great switched on team helping with everything as well. As usual, they're spread out across the country and around the world, but having people in 4 timezones is a huge bonus.
^ * ^ * ^ * ^ * ^
In other news, if anyone was wondering how much damage an internet stalker can do in real life, one of the kids had a stalker log in to his msn and start messaging contacts. I was woken by a phone call at 5.30 in the morning from Boston because the stalker thought it would be funny to get this kid's mates to "show more than (their) faces" on webcam by this creep.
The kid has to face these people at school next week and explain that it wasn't him and why this cretin is stalking him. It's all happening in England too which makes it almost impossible for me to trot round to the stalker's place and give him a fat dose of how's yer aunty.
I did the next best thing though; I gathered all the logs from all the kids involved and emailed the whole lot off to Scotland Yard with as much detail as I know about the creep who's doing it.
So, if you know Keiron Harkin of Preston, Lancs, do be sure and brick the maggot's windows.
^ * ^ * ^ * ^ * ^ * ^
The party in Narre Warren made me laugh a bit.
The media scrum afterwards made me sick to the pit of my stomach. If I were Corey Delaney, I'd be pressing assault charges on that fucker who manhandled him in the radio studio.
On A Current Affair, the reporter seemed proud after waiting around outside a police station all day for a chance of catching a glimpse of 2008's first hero, he got wind of the fact Corey was at Frankston beach and the media circus stalked the lad even there. Creepy suckholes.
They're all over the kid like sunburn and because Corey won't take off those epic sunnies, they hate him. They can't understand why he won't co-operate. They ask him megalithicly stupid questions like "do you regret what you did?" to which Corey quite rightly says "I didn't do the damage, so I'm not responsible for what other people did."
He's kicking the media's arse with his attitude and that is fantastic. No he ain't gunna toe the media line and no he ain't gunna be made to feel contrite because of stupid questions about morality and responsibility.
He's 16 not 24!! He lives in Narre Warren, not some salacious upmarket utopian suburb.
The more Corey refuses to bow to media pressure, the more the rest of the non-deadhearted sections of the population cheer him and the more intense the media scrutiny becomes.
He's been offered a guest spot as a host for Big Brother 2008. I wonder how many more slightly savvy but equally creepy media bosses will jump on the band wagon and try to make him bow their will by offering bribes.
I just get the feeling it either won't happen or it'll be a monumental disaster for them. You don't tame kids like Corey Delaney. You find out what he likes and get him to put his name on stuff. How perfect would it be for RayBan or Oakley to have their sunnies on that kid's face.
Most of them are complete crap, which I sort of expected but I did at least expect to be able to upload and update the site contents as and when I wanted.
They all have the same cPanel editing which is geared to complete novices at web design which didn't suit me at all, so I design the site on my desktop then upload it as code when the page is done. No problems.
Well... that is until I opened the site in Firefox and IE and noticed the vast difference in layout between the two browsers, then the browser hacking started and it took me 4 hours to get rid of as many bugs and tweak the code so it presents almost identically in both browsers.
I tried to upload the code in 2 of the 5 free hosting sites I picked and one just wouldn't even let me into the cPanel environment.
The other, after wrestling with the code, I joined the host's forum and made a note of how much of a bitch it was manipulating the css to cater for the different browsers and lo and behold, when I signed in tonight to do more updating, the best site of the 5 I've tried fixed up the css issue and now it's twice as easy and convenient as it was before.
So, if you're looking for a free webhosting service with no banner ads, no pop-ups or pop-unders, I seriously suggest trotting along to 977mb.com and signing up.
Sure there are hosts with more space allowance; I got ones with 2gb, 5gb and 10gb but what's the point when almost 1gb is more than enough for what I'm doing and the site actually works and the admins are on the ball and responsive.
I've got a great switched on team helping with everything as well. As usual, they're spread out across the country and around the world, but having people in 4 timezones is a huge bonus.
^ * ^ * ^ * ^ * ^
In other news, if anyone was wondering how much damage an internet stalker can do in real life, one of the kids had a stalker log in to his msn and start messaging contacts. I was woken by a phone call at 5.30 in the morning from Boston because the stalker thought it would be funny to get this kid's mates to "show more than (their) faces" on webcam by this creep.
The kid has to face these people at school next week and explain that it wasn't him and why this cretin is stalking him. It's all happening in England too which makes it almost impossible for me to trot round to the stalker's place and give him a fat dose of how's yer aunty.
I did the next best thing though; I gathered all the logs from all the kids involved and emailed the whole lot off to Scotland Yard with as much detail as I know about the creep who's doing it.
So, if you know Keiron Harkin of Preston, Lancs, do be sure and brick the maggot's windows.
^ * ^ * ^ * ^ * ^ * ^
The party in Narre Warren made me laugh a bit.
The media scrum afterwards made me sick to the pit of my stomach. If I were Corey Delaney, I'd be pressing assault charges on that fucker who manhandled him in the radio studio.
On A Current Affair, the reporter seemed proud after waiting around outside a police station all day for a chance of catching a glimpse of 2008's first hero, he got wind of the fact Corey was at Frankston beach and the media circus stalked the lad even there. Creepy suckholes.
They're all over the kid like sunburn and because Corey won't take off those epic sunnies, they hate him. They can't understand why he won't co-operate. They ask him megalithicly stupid questions like "do you regret what you did?" to which Corey quite rightly says "I didn't do the damage, so I'm not responsible for what other people did."
He's kicking the media's arse with his attitude and that is fantastic. No he ain't gunna toe the media line and no he ain't gunna be made to feel contrite because of stupid questions about morality and responsibility.
He's 16 not 24!! He lives in Narre Warren, not some salacious upmarket utopian suburb.
The more Corey refuses to bow to media pressure, the more the rest of the non-deadhearted sections of the population cheer him and the more intense the media scrutiny becomes.
He's been offered a guest spot as a host for Big Brother 2008. I wonder how many more slightly savvy but equally creepy media bosses will jump on the band wagon and try to make him bow their will by offering bribes.
I just get the feeling it either won't happen or it'll be a monumental disaster for them. You don't tame kids like Corey Delaney. You find out what he likes and get him to put his name on stuff. How perfect would it be for RayBan or Oakley to have their sunnies on that kid's face.
Wednesday, January 09, 2008
Bloody YouTube, the tightarses..
500 character comment limit my arse.
Here's the vid:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FXXaAdi4XTE&NR=1
And here's the comment:
16 in a row - the last 2 against blokes with mos. Sam Kekovich has the answer: You can't expect a top team to adopt a policy and then abandon it at the first sign of trouble. A bunch of left wing bleeding heart soft cocks would bow to the forces of nature and grow back the mo to regain that lost aura of masculinity but what a lot of bullshit that is. Look at all the mo wearing poofters in history, Mercury, Olivier, Dumbledore... The true test of courage is the team that turns adversity to its advantage and "natural forces" on its head and drags the rest of the world kicking and screaming into its own future and ignoring those un-Australian forces still living in 2005 that think the mo maketh the man. It doesn't. Not any more. The Australian way is only the way and the rest of the world has to accept that if they want to get anywhere in this life. Them and those mo wearing jungle bunnies comprehensively thrashed by the all-conquering hero test nation of the planet have to smarten up their thinking, throw a lamb chop on the barbie and crack open an ice cold beer.
And the best cold beer is Vic.
You know it makes sense.
Here's the vid:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FXXaAdi4XTE&NR=1
And here's the comment:
16 in a row - the last 2 against blokes with mos. Sam Kekovich has the answer: You can't expect a top team to adopt a policy and then abandon it at the first sign of trouble. A bunch of left wing bleeding heart soft cocks would bow to the forces of nature and grow back the mo to regain that lost aura of masculinity but what a lot of bullshit that is. Look at all the mo wearing poofters in history, Mercury, Olivier, Dumbledore... The true test of courage is the team that turns adversity to its advantage and "natural forces" on its head and drags the rest of the world kicking and screaming into its own future and ignoring those un-Australian forces still living in 2005 that think the mo maketh the man. It doesn't. Not any more. The Australian way is only the way and the rest of the world has to accept that if they want to get anywhere in this life. Them and those mo wearing jungle bunnies comprehensively thrashed by the all-conquering hero test nation of the planet have to smarten up their thinking, throw a lamb chop on the barbie and crack open an ice cold beer.
And the best cold beer is Vic.
You know it makes sense.
Wednesday, December 19, 2007
Here we go again - Judges, wtf??
This landed in my inbox today...
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,22946347-2,00.html
Ok, so the judge explains himself in a manner I reckon is just plain confused but further on in the story, there's this bit of utter stupidity...
For fuck's sake, the kid was 11, he's not ABLE to give consent. Are you all fucking sunstruck up there or stupid or what? What the hell is the judiciary coming to? Are they all following last year's lead of UK judges who trotted out similar bullshit?
I just don't get it.
These people are supposed to be legal authorities.
The cops do their job and I have enormous respect for the work they do. Investigations are actually able to proceed despite the unbelievable amount of mire through which cops have to wade so how do the poor coppers feel when a year long investigation ends up with a bullshit result like that.
I've got 4 things on the go with cops at this moment. Every day brings new information, every day there's another kid telling me stuff they're embarrassed to tell the authorities. With a judiciary and legal system that trots out this kind of insanity, what the fuck am I supposed to tell those kids????
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,22946347-2,00.html
TWO men and three teenagers who sexually abused an 11-year-old boy at a remote Top End Aboriginal community should not be called rapists, according to a Supreme Court judge.
Ok, so the judge explains himself in a manner I reckon is just plain confused but further on in the story, there's this bit of utter stupidity...
"They have to prove not only that the victim didn't consent, but that the offender or offenders were aware that the victim was not consenting."
For fuck's sake, the kid was 11, he's not ABLE to give consent. Are you all fucking sunstruck up there or stupid or what? What the hell is the judiciary coming to? Are they all following last year's lead of UK judges who trotted out similar bullshit?
I just don't get it.
These people are supposed to be legal authorities.
The cops do their job and I have enormous respect for the work they do. Investigations are actually able to proceed despite the unbelievable amount of mire through which cops have to wade so how do the poor coppers feel when a year long investigation ends up with a bullshit result like that.
I've got 4 things on the go with cops at this moment. Every day brings new information, every day there's another kid telling me stuff they're embarrassed to tell the authorities. With a judiciary and legal system that trots out this kind of insanity, what the fuck am I supposed to tell those kids????
Tuesday, December 18, 2007
And the wheels on the bus...
This guy asks a "serious" question...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vMY8vr2ktGY
This guy is your perfect answer...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Gj36RklMJY
Just bring back the noose, there is no such thing as rehabilitation for those creeps because they refuse to accept there is anything wrong with themselves for a start AND they're campaigning for equal rights and protections so they're not subjected to the same prejudices and hate propaganda formerly suffered by gays, blacks and women and, they say, Jews.
Gimme a break!
Spend just one week doing what I've been doing all year and then come back with a pedophile apologist's line. One week. I fucking dare you.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vMY8vr2ktGY
This guy is your perfect answer...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Gj36RklMJY
Just bring back the noose, there is no such thing as rehabilitation for those creeps because they refuse to accept there is anything wrong with themselves for a start AND they're campaigning for equal rights and protections so they're not subjected to the same prejudices and hate propaganda formerly suffered by gays, blacks and women and, they say, Jews.
Gimme a break!
Spend just one week doing what I've been doing all year and then come back with a pedophile apologist's line. One week. I fucking dare you.
randomness.
Last week I was given an email address to communicate directly with a particular detective sergeant here in Melbourne.
Bonus points or what!
Met Rutger Hauer the other week too. What a great bloke! Really friendly and actually spent some time to talk, not just parrot some crappy show-biz lines or advertising schtik.
I also bullied a particular social networking site into removing a member who is known to put the hard word on kids for webcam sessions. The CEO of the site himself came to visit my blog and within minutes, the profile had been blocked.
There is, of course, other stuff going on as well, but the people involved in all of that don't need me crowing on about what a great bunch of people they are so I won't, except to say it's the best bush telegraph ever.
Bonus points or what!
Met Rutger Hauer the other week too. What a great bloke! Really friendly and actually spent some time to talk, not just parrot some crappy show-biz lines or advertising schtik.
I also bullied a particular social networking site into removing a member who is known to put the hard word on kids for webcam sessions. The CEO of the site himself came to visit my blog and within minutes, the profile had been blocked.
There is, of course, other stuff going on as well, but the people involved in all of that don't need me crowing on about what a great bunch of people they are so I won't, except to say it's the best bush telegraph ever.
Sunday, December 09, 2007
Facing up
From last Monday's Register...
Mark Zuckerberg has been given a taste of his own medicine: his personal information is being plastered all over the web forever.
The Facebook boss has failed in a court bid to gag a magazine that published data including drunken extracts from his college diary and his social security number.
Federal judge Douglas Woodlock told the 23-year-old's lawyers on Friday that the independent Harvard alumni magazine 02138 had the right to release the documents, which were part of another court case.
02138's investigation centred on the dispute between Zuckerberg and the operators of ConnectU, another Harvard-founded social network. It's alleged that in the early days of Facebook, "the new Bill Gates" nicked ideas and source code from brothers Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss, who had asked him to work on their project.
Digging into that period, freelance reporter Luke O'Brien turned up a series of depositions and other documents on a visit to the courthouse, and the magazine ran them in support of his article. The piece is sympathetic to the Winklevoss twins and reports accusations by classmates that Zuckerberg had lied in front of them.
Facebook lawyers applied to have the documents taken down on Thursday, saying the court had ordered them to be sealed.
A spokeswoman told the Wall Street Journal: "One reason the court ordered certain documents' protection was to prevent exactly what has happened: misusing documents and taking documents out of context to sling mud."
Their failed application also attempted to force O'Brien to reveal how he obtained the files, since they had been locked up. He has maintained he was given them by a Federal Appeals Court clerk.
The judge denied all Facebook's claims. According to the New York Times, the clerk mistakenly handed over the files to O'Brien.
Zuckerberg and Co. will be hoping Friday's decision marks the end of a run of public embarrassments for Facebook. On Thursday, it was finally forced to bow to pressure over its creepy new ad system Beacon.
There could be more privacy-related defeats ahead, however. The UK's Information Commissioner is investigating Facebook's "Hotel California" policy on user data that means accounts can only be deactivated, never deleted.
For what I really want to say, well.. that's for my MySpace.
Mark Zuckerberg has been given a taste of his own medicine: his personal information is being plastered all over the web forever.
The Facebook boss has failed in a court bid to gag a magazine that published data including drunken extracts from his college diary and his social security number.
Federal judge Douglas Woodlock told the 23-year-old's lawyers on Friday that the independent Harvard alumni magazine 02138 had the right to release the documents, which were part of another court case.
02138's investigation centred on the dispute between Zuckerberg and the operators of ConnectU, another Harvard-founded social network. It's alleged that in the early days of Facebook, "the new Bill Gates" nicked ideas and source code from brothers Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss, who had asked him to work on their project.
Digging into that period, freelance reporter Luke O'Brien turned up a series of depositions and other documents on a visit to the courthouse, and the magazine ran them in support of his article. The piece is sympathetic to the Winklevoss twins and reports accusations by classmates that Zuckerberg had lied in front of them.
Facebook lawyers applied to have the documents taken down on Thursday, saying the court had ordered them to be sealed.
A spokeswoman told the Wall Street Journal: "One reason the court ordered certain documents' protection was to prevent exactly what has happened: misusing documents and taking documents out of context to sling mud."
Their failed application also attempted to force O'Brien to reveal how he obtained the files, since they had been locked up. He has maintained he was given them by a Federal Appeals Court clerk.
The judge denied all Facebook's claims. According to the New York Times, the clerk mistakenly handed over the files to O'Brien.
Zuckerberg and Co. will be hoping Friday's decision marks the end of a run of public embarrassments for Facebook. On Thursday, it was finally forced to bow to pressure over its creepy new ad system Beacon.
There could be more privacy-related defeats ahead, however. The UK's Information Commissioner is investigating Facebook's "Hotel California" policy on user data that means accounts can only be deactivated, never deleted.
For what I really want to say, well.. that's for my MySpace.
Monday, December 03, 2007
Good lawd!
There appears to still be one poor misguided idiot who thinks I have claimed to be anything more than a complete bastard.
Others, bless them, have credited me with being possessed of moral virtue, I never have.
Of course I can actually PROVE where others have said I'm a nice person, the liar leaving comments on my recent posts can't prove any of their claims. Not one. It's just the same old accusations based on distortions, false claims, misconceptions and half truths. But not one skerrick of evidence.
Of course, this being the internet, unfounded accusations are par for the course, however what is absolutely unforgivable is to comment on someone's blog with the most boring lot of repetitive, sanctimonious and pompous load of old bollox time after time and more and more longwinded each time...
Look at my code of conduct... now look at the very first item in my code of conduct.
Got it?
Post whatever, just don't bore the fuck out of me with repetitive drivel which showcases your penchant for adjectives over actual objectives.
Others, bless them, have credited me with being possessed of moral virtue, I never have.
Of course I can actually PROVE where others have said I'm a nice person, the liar leaving comments on my recent posts can't prove any of their claims. Not one. It's just the same old accusations based on distortions, false claims, misconceptions and half truths. But not one skerrick of evidence.
Of course, this being the internet, unfounded accusations are par for the course, however what is absolutely unforgivable is to comment on someone's blog with the most boring lot of repetitive, sanctimonious and pompous load of old bollox time after time and more and more longwinded each time...
Look at my code of conduct... now look at the very first item in my code of conduct.
Got it?
Post whatever, just don't bore the fuck out of me with repetitive drivel which showcases your penchant for adjectives over actual objectives.
Friday, November 30, 2007
A lot of people??
One comment in the barrage of desperate (but amusingly prolific) comments to this blog yesterday said a lot of people are wondering about me.
It is, of course, a lie.
In the website Outfoxed, the argument from authority frequently used by Fox News journalists is exposed for its dishonesty. Some people say - is a fallacious argument.
Being from Liars Team HQ though, this sort of dishonesty is only to be expected. It's what they do, after all...
So, if a lot of people are wondering about me, the anonymous commenter must therefore be able to name at least a few of them...
They won't - that would lead to all sorts of discomfort for them. But it'll be interesting to see what lie they use to escape the burden of proof.
Go for it, liars.... who are these "lot of people"?
It is, of course, a lie.
In the website Outfoxed, the argument from authority frequently used by Fox News journalists is exposed for its dishonesty. Some people say - is a fallacious argument.
Being from Liars Team HQ though, this sort of dishonesty is only to be expected. It's what they do, after all...
So, if a lot of people are wondering about me, the anonymous commenter must therefore be able to name at least a few of them...
They won't - that would lead to all sorts of discomfort for them. But it'll be interesting to see what lie they use to escape the burden of proof.
Go for it, liars.... who are these "lot of people"?
Sunday, November 18, 2007
Truth comes out again...
I was wondering what had prompted the rash of attendees to this blog from Liars Team HQ last week, so I had myself a bit of a peruse for the 2nd time in about 4 months or so and found the following exchange...
c.I refuse to argue with someone who acts like Chatrat and who refuses to acknowledge when she fucks up and does the wrong thing.
This must be why Lea the Liar thinks she's perfect. (She SO did not tell me to tell her I love her even if I didn't mean it. -->fkn amazed emote picture here <-- ) She also SO ordered a copy of the play, (read "credit card declined" - couldn't afford $15)
The riposte by Clorox was fairly passable though...
C. Acting like ChatRat? Lol. I am so sick of your emotionally charged overreactions lately. I teased you in chat, and you said "I'm not talking to you anymore" just like Reesa does when someone disagrees. Now you're doing it here again. If I disclosed your credit card information, and told you you're fucking up your children, then perhaps you may have a point. However, you don't. You're lashing out, much like Reesa, and making random nonsensical stabbing motions. You're dropping your basket. Yet again. Quel surprise.
Welcome to the "Sick of Loopy Lea Club", Claratyne. Nice going though, the stupid cow had to come and revisit the dead brother theme she sooooo regretted last year. Truly though, how could anyone be surprised that Lea and Reesa are friends? They're both barking fucking mad schizoid breadknifing maniacs. (At least Reesa is good for a laugh though, even if it is a bit like shooting fish in a barrel.)
Oh, in case you both hadn't noticed, ChatRat has moved on. Clearly, you freaks need to do the same.
c.I refuse to argue with someone who acts like Chatrat and who refuses to acknowledge when she fucks up and does the wrong thing.
This must be why Lea the Liar thinks she's perfect. (She SO did not tell me to tell her I love her even if I didn't mean it. -->fkn amazed emote picture here <-- ) She also SO ordered a copy of the play, (read "credit card declined" - couldn't afford $15)
The riposte by Clorox was fairly passable though...
C. Acting like ChatRat? Lol. I am so sick of your emotionally charged overreactions lately. I teased you in chat, and you said "I'm not talking to you anymore" just like Reesa does when someone disagrees. Now you're doing it here again. If I disclosed your credit card information, and told you you're fucking up your children, then perhaps you may have a point. However, you don't. You're lashing out, much like Reesa, and making random nonsensical stabbing motions. You're dropping your basket. Yet again. Quel surprise.
Welcome to the "Sick of Loopy Lea Club", Claratyne. Nice going though, the stupid cow had to come and revisit the dead brother theme she sooooo regretted last year. Truly though, how could anyone be surprised that Lea and Reesa are friends? They're both barking fucking mad schizoid breadknifing maniacs. (At least Reesa is good for a laugh though, even if it is a bit like shooting fish in a barrel.)
Oh, in case you both hadn't noticed, ChatRat has moved on. Clearly, you freaks need to do the same.
Pedophiles are such fkn cowards.
dave harry says (2:59 AM):
asl
Paul says (2:59 AM):
40 male Australia and a friend of the girl you're trying to wank on cam for.
Paul says (2:59 AM):
guess what creep.
Paul says (2:59 AM):
you're busted
dave harry says (3:00 AM):
what
dave harry says (3:00 AM):
u taking a bout
Paul says (3:00 AM):
you want a c&p?
dave harry says (3:00 AM):
what
Paul says (3:00 AM):
dave harry says:
u like cock
me says:
if some1 finds out u have been sayin this stuff
dave harry says:
they wont
dave harry says:
any way
me says:
how do ya no?
dave harry says:
dave harry says (3:00 AM):
not me
Paul says (3:01 AM):
nice try
Paul says (3:01 AM):
ain't gunna cut no ice with me
dave harry says (3:01 AM):
so what u going to do
dave harry says (3:01 AM):
come on
Paul says (3:01 AM):
hahaha..
Paul says (3:01 AM):
call her a bitch did you
dave harry says (3:01 AM):
nothing
Paul says (3:01 AM):
blame the kid
Paul says (3:02 AM):
go on, coward
dave harry says (3:02 AM):
i did
dave harry says (3:02 AM):
why are u chatting with her then
Paul says (3:03 AM):
because she asked for my help dealing with a cretin like you who thinks it's cool for a 25yo to j/o off cam for a girl he knows is only 14
dave harry says (3:03 AM):
she added me to all this
dave harry says (3:03 AM):
msn and net log??
dave harry says (3:03 AM):
so its chat
Paul says (3:03 AM):
so you're going to blame her again...
dave harry says (3:03 AM):
and when she want to me
Paul says (3:03 AM):
still isn't going to cut any ice with me.. you're the adult.
dave harry says (3:03 AM):
i wont any way
Paul says (3:04 AM):
what's more... I know you have her phone number and I'm warning you if you try to contact her by phone, she and I will both notify the police immediately.
dave harry says (3:04 AM):
i dont have her number
dave harry says (3:04 AM):
so how can i
dave harry says (3:05 AM):
so u are in her then
dave harry says (3:05 AM):
i am sorry
dave harry says (3:05 AM):
and when she gets on i will delete her
Paul says (3:05 AM):
She's already blocked and deleted you anyway
dave harry says (3:05 AM):
sweet
dave harry says (3:06 AM):
just seem that a 14 is want sex and cam with any 1
dave harry says (3:06 AM):
any way
dave harry says (3:06 AM):
its cool
Paul says (3:06 AM):
don't keep blaming her, she's a kid and as an adult you're supposed to know better
dave harry says (3:06 AM):
i wont txt/ msg at all
dave harry says (3:06 AM):
its chat
Paul says (3:06 AM):
how can you, you don't have her number
dave harry says (3:07 AM):
maybe she shoud lead guys on like she has
Paul says (3:07 AM):
it's not chat when you offer to j/o off cam... and the law takes a real dim view when you know she's underage
Paul says (3:07 AM):
oh man.. you best block me now.. you're just digging yourself into a deeper hole
dave harry says (3:08 AM):
point 1.... the day i she added me.... why
dave harry says (3:08 AM):
??
dave harry says (3:08 AM):
why??
dave harry says (3:08 AM):
tell me
dave harry says (3:08 AM):
..................................
dave harry says (3:08 AM):
u canrt
dave harry says (3:08 AM):
bye
Paul says (3:08 AM):
you are blaming a 14yo
dave harry says (3:09 AM):
no
dave harry says (3:09 AM):
i am not
Paul says (3:09 AM):
you knew she was 14 yet you still offered to j.o on cam for her
dave harry says (3:09 AM):
why the fck would she add some of that age
Paul says (3:09 AM):
you tried to deny it when I challenged you
dave harry says (3:09 AM):
and why would she lie about her age
Paul says (3:09 AM):
and she's talking to me - and she knows I'm 40
dave harry says (3:10 AM):
i have chatted with her 6 or 7 times and she hasnt told difrent
dave harry says (3:10 AM):
and why would she look at my cam if she was like want some
dave harry says (3:10 AM):
dont make sence
Paul says (3:10 AM):
then you don't need to bother talking to her any more then do you.
dave harry says (3:11 AM):
i wont
dave harry says (3:11 AM):
if she chats with me
dave harry says (3:11 AM):
she will be canned
dave harry says (3:11 AM):
not on
dave harry says (3:12 AM):
dude .... again sorry
dave harry says (3:12 AM):
but at her age why is lead guys on
dave harry says (3:12 AM):
??
Paul says (3:12 AM):
I have an answer to that but you're not going to get it.
dave harry says (3:13 AM):
in ur words
Paul says (3:13 AM):
In my words, I have an answer to your question but I'm not going to give it to you.
dave harry says (3:13 AM):
when?/ where
dave harry says (3:13 AM):
thats poor
dave harry says (3:13 AM):
say it
Paul says (3:14 AM):
There's nothing to say.. she told you she is 14 and you kept on with your chat. You've broken the law now just hope to hell she or I don't report you to Crimestoppers for it.
Paul says (3:15 AM):
we're both pretty familiar with the ceop.gov.uk website too.
dave harry says (3:15 AM):
i am from tasmaina dude,,, not the uk
dave harry says (3:15 AM):
so no
Paul says (3:15 AM):
so yeah... crimestoppes applies right to you...
Paul says (3:15 AM):
1800 333 000.. ring any bells?
dave harry says (3:16 AM):
no
dave harry says (3:16 AM):
why would i
Paul says (3:16 AM):
that's the cop hotline right around Australia
Paul says (3:16 AM):
it's a free call
Paul says (3:17 AM):
anyone can call anonymously...
Paul says (3:17 AM):
There's a website too
dave harry says (3:17 AM):
thanks 4 the tip
Paul says (3:17 AM):
where chatlogs can be uploaded
Paul says (3:17 AM):
am I being clear enough yet?
dave harry says (3:18 AM):
i am here 4 chat
dave harry says (3:18 AM):
and thats all
dave harry says (3:18 AM):
i am pissed and should be in bed
dave harry says (3:18 AM):
i am goin now
dave harry says (3:19 AM):
by the way
dave harry says (3:19 AM):
she been look at me today at net log?? why
Paul says (3:19 AM):
you're married with a kid.. why would you j/o on cam for her?
dave harry says (3:20 AM):
i am going to leave it here
Paul says (3:20 AM):
I bet you are
dave harry says (3:20 AM):
she has been deleted
Paul says (3:20 AM):
say hi to the missus for me
asl
Paul says (2:59 AM):
40 male Australia and a friend of the girl you're trying to wank on cam for.
Paul says (2:59 AM):
guess what creep.
Paul says (2:59 AM):
you're busted
dave harry says (3:00 AM):
what
dave harry says (3:00 AM):
u taking a bout
Paul says (3:00 AM):
you want a c&p?
dave harry says (3:00 AM):
what
Paul says (3:00 AM):
dave harry says:
u like cock
me says:
if some1 finds out u have been sayin this stuff
dave harry says:
they wont
dave harry says:
any way
me says:
how do ya no?
dave harry says:
dave harry says (3:00 AM):
not me
Paul says (3:01 AM):
nice try
Paul says (3:01 AM):
ain't gunna cut no ice with me
dave harry says (3:01 AM):
so what u going to do
dave harry says (3:01 AM):
come on
Paul says (3:01 AM):
hahaha..
Paul says (3:01 AM):
call her a bitch did you
dave harry says (3:01 AM):
nothing
Paul says (3:01 AM):
blame the kid
Paul says (3:02 AM):
go on, coward
dave harry says (3:02 AM):
i did
dave harry says (3:02 AM):
why are u chatting with her then
Paul says (3:03 AM):
because she asked for my help dealing with a cretin like you who thinks it's cool for a 25yo to j/o off cam for a girl he knows is only 14
dave harry says (3:03 AM):
she added me to all this
dave harry says (3:03 AM):
msn and net log??
dave harry says (3:03 AM):
so its chat
Paul says (3:03 AM):
so you're going to blame her again...
dave harry says (3:03 AM):
and when she want to me
Paul says (3:03 AM):
still isn't going to cut any ice with me.. you're the adult.
dave harry says (3:03 AM):
i wont any way
Paul says (3:04 AM):
what's more... I know you have her phone number and I'm warning you if you try to contact her by phone, she and I will both notify the police immediately.
dave harry says (3:04 AM):
i dont have her number
dave harry says (3:04 AM):
so how can i
dave harry says (3:05 AM):
so u are in her then
dave harry says (3:05 AM):
i am sorry
dave harry says (3:05 AM):
and when she gets on i will delete her
Paul says (3:05 AM):
She's already blocked and deleted you anyway
dave harry says (3:05 AM):
sweet
dave harry says (3:06 AM):
just seem that a 14 is want sex and cam with any 1
dave harry says (3:06 AM):
any way
dave harry says (3:06 AM):
its cool
Paul says (3:06 AM):
don't keep blaming her, she's a kid and as an adult you're supposed to know better
dave harry says (3:06 AM):
i wont txt/ msg at all
dave harry says (3:06 AM):
its chat
Paul says (3:06 AM):
how can you, you don't have her number
dave harry says (3:07 AM):
maybe she shoud lead guys on like she has
Paul says (3:07 AM):
it's not chat when you offer to j/o off cam... and the law takes a real dim view when you know she's underage
Paul says (3:07 AM):
oh man.. you best block me now.. you're just digging yourself into a deeper hole
dave harry says (3:08 AM):
point 1.... the day i she added me.... why
dave harry says (3:08 AM):
??
dave harry says (3:08 AM):
why??
dave harry says (3:08 AM):
tell me
dave harry says (3:08 AM):
..................................
dave harry says (3:08 AM):
u canrt
dave harry says (3:08 AM):
bye
Paul says (3:08 AM):
you are blaming a 14yo
dave harry says (3:09 AM):
no
dave harry says (3:09 AM):
i am not
Paul says (3:09 AM):
you knew she was 14 yet you still offered to j.o on cam for her
dave harry says (3:09 AM):
why the fck would she add some of that age
Paul says (3:09 AM):
you tried to deny it when I challenged you
dave harry says (3:09 AM):
and why would she lie about her age
Paul says (3:09 AM):
and she's talking to me - and she knows I'm 40
dave harry says (3:10 AM):
i have chatted with her 6 or 7 times and she hasnt told difrent
dave harry says (3:10 AM):
and why would she look at my cam if she was like want some
dave harry says (3:10 AM):
dont make sence
Paul says (3:10 AM):
then you don't need to bother talking to her any more then do you.
dave harry says (3:11 AM):
i wont
dave harry says (3:11 AM):
if she chats with me
dave harry says (3:11 AM):
she will be canned
dave harry says (3:11 AM):
not on
dave harry says (3:12 AM):
dude .... again sorry
dave harry says (3:12 AM):
but at her age why is lead guys on
dave harry says (3:12 AM):
??
Paul says (3:12 AM):
I have an answer to that but you're not going to get it.
dave harry says (3:13 AM):
in ur words
Paul says (3:13 AM):
In my words, I have an answer to your question but I'm not going to give it to you.
dave harry says (3:13 AM):
when?/ where
dave harry says (3:13 AM):
thats poor
dave harry says (3:13 AM):
say it
Paul says (3:14 AM):
There's nothing to say.. she told you she is 14 and you kept on with your chat. You've broken the law now just hope to hell she or I don't report you to Crimestoppers for it.
Paul says (3:15 AM):
we're both pretty familiar with the ceop.gov.uk website too.
dave harry says (3:15 AM):
i am from tasmaina dude,,, not the uk
dave harry says (3:15 AM):
so no
Paul says (3:15 AM):
so yeah... crimestoppes applies right to you...
Paul says (3:15 AM):
1800 333 000.. ring any bells?
dave harry says (3:16 AM):
no
dave harry says (3:16 AM):
why would i
Paul says (3:16 AM):
that's the cop hotline right around Australia
Paul says (3:16 AM):
it's a free call
Paul says (3:17 AM):
anyone can call anonymously...
Paul says (3:17 AM):
There's a website too
dave harry says (3:17 AM):
thanks 4 the tip
Paul says (3:17 AM):
where chatlogs can be uploaded
Paul says (3:17 AM):
am I being clear enough yet?
dave harry says (3:18 AM):
i am here 4 chat
dave harry says (3:18 AM):
and thats all
dave harry says (3:18 AM):
i am pissed and should be in bed
dave harry says (3:18 AM):
i am goin now
dave harry says (3:19 AM):
by the way
dave harry says (3:19 AM):
she been look at me today at net log?? why
Paul says (3:19 AM):
you're married with a kid.. why would you j/o on cam for her?
dave harry says (3:20 AM):
i am going to leave it here
Paul says (3:20 AM):
I bet you are
dave harry says (3:20 AM):
she has been deleted
Paul says (3:20 AM):
say hi to the missus for me
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
